Initially, my degree show installation seems to be in stark contrast to the sculptures. It consists of thirty-six frames, each measuring 1m x 0.5m. They are installed to be equidistant from one another, a repetition that results in form that is geometric, controlled, and fixed. The sculptures are instead curved and biomorphic, dancing on their toes. Emotionally, however, the frames relate to the nature of the work. The plinth becomes light and airy like the sculptures. They feel fluid, as though they would extend into space. They are made of wood but were painted in a gritty white so they look more powdery and soft, like they are disintegrating.
My intention was to create an installation that was more considered than the familiar plinth without detracting from the work itself. Both the install and the work share an essence. They relate in quality, not quantity.
This rendition is based on an initial idea of the plinth around an external corner (the outside of a room). Not only does the plinth infinitely expand towards the viewer, but a space is empty. In the RCA 2022 degree show installation, a space exists in the center. There is 120 degrees confined, and then the plinths open into a space that is 120 degrees unconfined. The confined empty space and the unconfined room that the viewer occupies mirror one another. With the original concept around an external corner, the plinth infinitely expands and the space grows infinitely larger proportionately. I am interested in structures and what these structures do not account for. This relates to my education in Gender Studies, particularly systemic problems juxtaposed with personal realities. The installation also reflects my interest in quantum physics, particularly in response to Karen Barad's "On Touching--the Inhuman That Therefore I Am." In this reading, she explains quantum physics' explanation for an electron:
"the electron’s self-energy takes the form of an electron exchanging a virtual photon (the quantum of the electromagnetic field) with itself. Richard Feynman, one of the key authors of quantum field theory, frames the difficulty in explicitly moral terms: “Instead of going directly from one point to another, the electron goes along for a while and suddenly emits a photon; then (horrors!) it absorbs its own photon. Perhaps there’s something ‘immoral’ about that, but the electron does it!” (Feynman 115–16)."
The electron maintains consistency and stability in the physical world by deviating--and in its very core identity at that--in the virtual world. This unseen virtual world necessitates the world we see and know. Opposites synergize instead of counteract. Identity shifts in one world and this allows it to stay the same in another. My installation is a reflection of this abstract thing that is duality.